state to condemn a person who committed murder to the death penalty in the 21st century? The innocence of the person is not in doubt here the person is undoubtedly culpable of murder. Thus, supposing that I am a regulator or a judge, I will answer the following question: is it ethical for a U.S.
Throughout history, law has continuously changed, being reinterpreted and redefined to ensure that it constantly reflects changes in society itself. On the contrary, the feature that fascinates me the most about law is the fact that law is never static. By categorical, I simply imply that there cannot be two truths for an issue, and not that law is static. cause grey areas in the assessment of justice and morality. I am interested in this topic because I believe that justice is essential for an ethical society, but mostly because I believe that justice is categorical thus, differences between interstate and intrastate laws in U.S.
This topic is socially relevant because an execution is an irreversible punishment.
The whole country is divided in its opinion about the death penalty 31 states still use capital punishment, while in 13 states, this practice has been outlawed (“States”). Capital punishment is one of the most-if not the most- controversial penal law practice in the U.S.
